To me, this is a problem. This example should have never been purchased to make a rental IMO. If I have $100k in property, it better be paying more than $1k per month. And I shouldn't have $103k invested in a house worth $117k 5 years later.
He was actually modeling that after one of my properties that I discussed with him.
There are a couple things wrong the assumptions that he had:
1) The house appraised for $120Kish when I bought it.
When a house is purchased the County Assessor has to use that as its "value" and apply appreciation to that baseline. So, in this example, I paid $103K for a house and immediately had $20K+ in equity. The current value is roughly $135K now.
2) He assumed I got $1K/month but it's actually been under contract from day 1 with the same tenant and rent is $1240/month right now.
So, this house has averaged ~$1200/month over 5 years which has paid $72K back on a $103K investment and the house is worth ~$30K more than I paid.
In essence, I paid $103K and 5 years later got that $103K back.