How did Pres. Carter put a ban on Iranians back in 1979/80??

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,323
Reaction score
4,286
Location
OKC area
Why no backlash? Because it was nationality based at a time when we were at odds with the leadership of a country...it was a diplomatic endeavor designed to pressure a government we didn't agree with, not aimed at refugees from a fractured nation, based on religion with no government to put pressure on.
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,951
Reaction score
46,070
Location
Tulsa
Why no backlash? Because it was nationality based at a time when we were at odds with the leadership of a country...it was a diplomatic endeavor designed to pressure a government we didn't agree with, not aimed at refugees from a fractured nation, based on religion with no government to put pressure on.

How many Iranians were responsible for terror attacks on our soil?
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,951
Reaction score
46,070
Location
Tulsa
It wasn't done to prevent attacks on our soul. It was diplomatic punishment aimed at a government we disagreed with...and there were humanitarian exemptions.

That makes it OK? 50,000 Iranian students had to report to immigration because of a disagreement?
 

SMS

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
15,323
Reaction score
4,286
Location
OKC area
That makes it OK?

Yes, it does IMHO.

If we were at war with Syria, I would be ok with it again. But turning away people fleeing a tyrannical government and civil war with horrors the likes of which we can't imagine simply based on the God they worship is entirely wrong.
 

JD8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
32,951
Reaction score
46,070
Location
Tulsa
Yes, it does IMHO.

If we were at war with Syria, I would be ok with it again. But turning away people fleeing a tyrannical government and horrors the likes of which we can't imagine simply based on the God they worship is entirely wrong.

I'm actually not for an outright banning of Syrians. I am agreeing with a step back and more conversation about the vetting process. A pause makes sense.... to me anyways.

I don't have a ton of sympathy for the god they worship. Even outside of extremists, there's a ton of Islamic values that seem to compromise American values and especially personal freedoms.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom