They say they can now.
If you violate some pollution laws or the clean water act, they say they have a RIGHT to come in and garnish your wages.
The EPA has not and cannot define what "pollution" really is on private property.
Supreme court case, Sackette vs EPA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency
The epa said they can't build on the property as its wetlands.
The supreme court shut down the EPA, but now they come back with a new ruling that says they can say what the violation is, and you can't push back on it, even though they don't have definite guide lines.
The EPA says they have the "power" to garnish wages without court approval.
WTF?
If you violate some pollution laws or the clean water act, they say they have a RIGHT to come in and garnish your wages.
The EPA has not and cannot define what "pollution" really is on private property.
Supreme court case, Sackette vs EPA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sackett_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency
The epa said they can't build on the property as its wetlands.
The supreme court shut down the EPA, but now they come back with a new ruling that says they can say what the violation is, and you can't push back on it, even though they don't have definite guide lines.
The EPA says they have the "power" to garnish wages without court approval.
WTF?