Why fire just a few people? My question is why did Guns and Ammo ever allow this to be published?
Did they want controversy?
Did they want to offend their target audience?
Did they want to lose subscriptions and advertisers?
Wouldn't this have been better to handle this "before" it was published...being "proactive" rather than "reactive"?
Again, why did they allow it to be published....who was or are the editor(s) ...may be a deeper or higher up's..CEO/Owner feelings allowing this article?
Anyone at Guns and Ammo on a suicide mission?
Ever think that maybe Dick was leaving anyway, so on the way out the door they came up with this article to be attention whores.