Hillary Clinton Won’t Admit Right To Bear Arms Is Constitutional

[RugersGR8]

CAUTION: HILLARY'S LIPS ARE MOVING!!!! BTW HILLARY, WHY DON'T YOU PROPOSE A SPECIAL TAX ON ILLEGAL DRUG DEALERS/USERS TO DEFRAY THE COST OF DRUG CRIMES/INJURIES. IMHO, YOU AND BILL PROBABLY WOULD OWE A VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF BACK TAXES??

Start at about 7:44 on this video for the 2nd Amendment attack:

 

[chuter]

I feel really hopeless and helpless whenever I see or hear this female human thing.
But getting mad isn't doing me any good.
I think all I can do that will count for anything is vote for whatever monkey is running against her, which I'll do.

 

[Sanford]

Hillary Clinton Won’t Admit Right To Bear Arms Is Constitutional

Technically, it's not. The Constitution acknowledges citizens' right to bear arms, it doesn't grant citizens the right to bear arms.

 

[Zaphod Beeblebrox]

Technically, it's not. The Constitution acknowledges citizens' right to bear arms, it doesn't grant citizens the right to bear arms.

St. Thomas would be proud.

Too often, people and the gov't forget this. It matters a lot because it changes the analysis of any proposed legislation, or at least it should.

 

[Biggsly]

Technically, it's not. The Constitution acknowledges citizens' right to bear arms, it doesn't grant citizens the right to bear arms.

This....

Too bad the libs will line up to vote for her.

 

[Werewolf]

Technically, it's not. The Constitution acknowledges citizens' pre-existing natural right to bear arms, it doesn't grant citizens the right to bear arms.

Fixed it for ya...

The pre-existing natural part is critical. It expresses the founders' belief that the Bill of Rights tells the government that it exists to protect rights that all men have just by being born - something contemporary law makers seem to forget or if they're dimocrats ignore or abhor.