Saddlebum beat me to it but he is right. Ersland can't have it both ways. He picked the defense he wanted to go with (Parker was alive and a threat) and he lost. Too bad really. If he had just told the truth in the first place and said "Well, yeah, the thug was down and not moving. He looked dead to me, but I just couldn't help myself" he would be looking at desecrating a dead body.
As it is he left the scene, came back, took a good look and then retrieved another gun and pumped 5 extra bullets into a blinded, unconscious, non-moving thug whose heart was still pumping blood ... because he thought the kid was still alive. That's a big no-no.
And lied about it. He stated in the initial interview that he pumped the 5 bullets BEFORE leaving to chase scumbag #2 down the street in a running gun battle.
Just for discussion:
As to the whole heart beating/blood pressure thing. I agree with CY totally about the fact that they just can't tell within 30 seconds of someone's heart stopping. He's right, just can't be done. However CY I think you are wrong one the "residual blood pressure" thing. I've seen it twice in my life, when someone's heart stops, the BP flatlines pretty much immediately right after that instant. And in both of these cases there was no damage to the circulatory system (I.E...leaking from gunshots).
I also question the blood pooling "proving" the guy didn't move. What is this? Not even a single twitch? That's what has been implied. I find that a bit hard to believe that they can prove that beyond doubt like they imply. Also I haven't read anything on this specific topic. Are they referring to the blood pooling in the wounds from the 5 shots, or are they talking about pooling on the floor from the head wound? Both? It would be dirt simple for them to conclude that he wasn't rolling around on the floor, trying to get up, etc. if they are talking about pooling on the floor. Now the within the wounds themselves, I view with a bit more skepticism. When you stop and think about the possibilities, it becomes clear that he screwed himself in so many ways with his lying and grandstanding. He had two avenues to walk from this charge, and he screwed himself out of both with his mouth. And has continued to do so even after "admission" to the jail.
Brain Dead....????
As to the whole heart beating/blood pressure thing. I agree with CY totally about the fact that they just can't tell within 30 seconds of someone's heart stopping. He's right, just can't be done. However CY I think you are wrong one the "residual blood pressure" thing. I've seen it twice in my life, when someone's heart stops, the BP flatlines pretty much immediately right after that instant. And in both of these cases there was no damage to the circulatory system (I.E...leaking from gunshots).
Most importantly, why is this a 5 star thread?
If no one has proved the thug was dead or alive..how was he convicted?
To murder someone they must be alive in the first place, the first shot being justifiable.(I see no wrong doing).But if no one can prove beyond a doubt that that he was alive...how was the next five shots murder?
And yes, I also agree Ersland is a dumbass for what he did after the first shot. He deserves a harsh punishment for his lying and actions afterwards. But I just can't see how you can kill a dead guy.
I also thought murder 1 was a premeditated action. Does someone know something I don't... did ersland pay the thugs to rob him or what?
In most states, first-degree murder is defined as an unlawful killing that is both willful and premeditated, meaning that it was committed after planning or "lying in wait" for the victim.
Enter your email address to join: