It’s all BS. How many times have the claimed “National Security” only to find out later that there wasn’t anything that even was close to national security. It’s their get out of jail free card. They just play it when they don’t want to release info.
AG Barr said he was going to color code the redactions and give a glossary of what that means and how each color applies vs the obama days when entire pages were redacted with zero explanation, only finding out later under FOI requests they didn't need to be redacted at all.
Every dumbocrat that ever praised AG Barr is piling on him now as incompetent and an imbecile. They are circling the wagons around the clintons and the illegal investigation against the Trump campaign.
If Barr actually does a competent investigation by appointing a special council that has prosecutorial powers like Mueller, there may be some heads roll.
Actually, Mueller is working with Barr on the redactions. Lets see how the most reputable man in DC(as liberals called Mueller at the start of the investigation) gets ripped by the dims when the report hits the street.
In actuality, the report according to some was complete before the mid term elections where Republicans lost the house. If anybody needs investigated for election interference and collusion, its Mueller.
It's all kabuki theatre, faux outrage, and pure unadulterated hypocrisy on the dims part. They know damn well that redactions have to occur by law, and they're on record demanding none. I say let's give it to them and everybody else too. They don't think it'll happen or else they wouldn't ask. I say we call their bet...
We really can't even though we would like to. If we violated the secrecy of the grand juries, our justice system would never recover.
Forced to watch MSNBC at the hotel today.
Here is a news excerpt.
SINCE THE MULLER REPORT CAME OUT A FEW WEEKS AGO it was determined that there was no Russian collusion THE REPORT SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT THE INVESTIGATION DID NOT EXONERATE TRUMP FROM OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
Then they went on to the walk to Marine 1 where Trump excoriated the investigation calling it an attempted coup against an elected president. A few days ago Trump gave quite a litany about the democrats and the border and illegals.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...p-illegal-immigration-crisis-border-security/
An excerpt:
THE PRESIDENT: "We’re working on a system where they stay together. But I will say that, by doing that, tremendous numbers — you know, under the Obama plan, you could separate children. They never did anything about that. Nobody talks about that. But under President Obama, they separated children from the parents. We actually put it so that that didn’t happen.
But what happens when you do that is you get tremendous numbers of people coming. It’s almost like an incentive to — when they hear they’re not going to be separated, they come many, many times over. But President Obama separated the children, the parents. And nobody complained. When we continued the exact same law, this country went crazy."
This is what the media ran with taken from that encounter with the press.
"TRUMP STATES HE WANTS TO CONTINUE THE POLICY OF SEPARATING CHILDREN FROM THEIR PARENTS."
This statement was taken from these two paragraphs Trump pointed out it was during the Obama presidency when the separations happened and not one mention of it from the media. I think it was several weeks ago that Trump pointed out the pictures of the children in cages were taken during the Obama years and the photos used as if they were occurring during his presidency. More fake news.
Can you just imagine what Trump's approval numbers would be if the media treated him like they did Obama? Hes over 50% right now.
People who only watch the major news channels don't know what we know about the Mueller investigation. What the FISA court saw as evidence to obtain warrants. What phonies the FBI higher ups were. They don't tell the public the president has the right to hire and fire the FBI director at will. Not when the media calls it obstruction because of the investigation. Think back. When has the media ever told the public about who solicited and paid for the documents?
Here is a news excerpt.
SINCE THE MULLER REPORT CAME OUT A FEW WEEKS AGO it was determined that there was no Russian collusion THE REPORT SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT THE INVESTIGATION DID NOT EXONERATE TRUMP FROM OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
Then they went on to the walk to Marine 1 where Trump excoriated the investigation calling it an attempted coup against an elected president. A few days ago Trump gave quite a litany about the democrats and the border and illegals.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...p-illegal-immigration-crisis-border-security/
An excerpt:
THE PRESIDENT: "We’re working on a system where they stay together. But I will say that, by doing that, tremendous numbers — you know, under the Obama plan, you could separate children. They never did anything about that. Nobody talks about that. But under President Obama, they separated children from the parents. We actually put it so that that didn’t happen.
But what happens when you do that is you get tremendous numbers of people coming. It’s almost like an incentive to — when they hear they’re not going to be separated, they come many, many times over. But President Obama separated the children, the parents. And nobody complained. When we continued the exact same law, this country went crazy."
This is what the media ran with taken from that encounter with the press.
"TRUMP STATES HE WANTS TO CONTINUE THE POLICY OF SEPARATING CHILDREN FROM THEIR PARENTS."
This statement was taken from these two paragraphs Trump pointed out it was during the Obama presidency when the separations happened and not one mention of it from the media. I think it was several weeks ago that Trump pointed out the pictures of the children in cages were taken during the Obama years and the photos used as if they were occurring during his presidency. More fake news.
Can you just imagine what Trump's approval numbers would be if the media treated him like they did Obama? Hes over 50% right now.
People who only watch the major news channels don't know what we know about the Mueller investigation. What the FISA court saw as evidence to obtain warrants. What phonies the FBI higher ups were. They don't tell the public the president has the right to hire and fire the FBI director at will. Not when the media calls it obstruction because of the investigation. Think back. When has the media ever told the public about who solicited and paid for the documents?
We can only hope AG Barr moves to purge and convict those that attempted the Coup and doesn't do the normal whitewash. He is under tremendous pressure now from the dumbocrats.
I'm only talking about this one case. It's pretty extraordinary in that federal law enforcement AND intelligence agencies tried to derail a presidential campaign in cahoots with the opposing candidate. The process wouldn't itself change. Future presidents could go rogue I guess, but legislation could be passed to define the circumstances and parameters that a President could declassify and publish them if it became necessary.
Similar threads
