That’s not quite the argument I was making. Yes, how hard the knocking was is extremely important in this case, but the issue shouldn’t be who makes the better argument. The bar is set much higher than that. The state must be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Doe didn’t believe someone was trying to break into his dwelling.
I absolutely agree in principle. But it will come down to swaying a jury by who makes the most convincing case in court.