There are a lot of people whose "common sense" tells them only police should have guns. A lot of other people have "common sense" to know that crime is random and police aren't there to protect you.
So whose common sense gets to decide?
There are a lot of people whose "common sense" tells them only police should have guns. A lot of other people have "common sense" to know that crime is random and police aren't there to protect you.
So whose common sense gets to decide?
All of ours. And we are all free to voice our opinions on the matter....just as repeatedly as you.
Another bad apple!
Just because you don't like it - shouldn't make it illegal. I think it's not as smart as concealed carry but it's just my opinion.
But continuing to hammer your anti opinion on a gun forum over and over = trolling
Why not just not comment on open carry issues? You know, like your mom said "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all"?
Just my opinion
But continuing to hammer your anti opinion on a gun forum over and over = trolling
Why not just not comment on open carry issues? You know, like your mom said "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all"?
Just my opinion
That's where you are missing the point of most of our discussions bulbboy. It's not an anti opinion. For many of us posting about OC, it's a differing opinion in regards to the appropriateness of it in certain situations. Painting someone who disagrees with you on aspects of OC as an "Anti" is cheap and weak.
If you, as a moderator, are saying that OSA has now become opencarry.com then I'll take it under advisement and adjust accordingly...but I am not "anti open carry".
I guess you missed my "Just my opinion"
So you painted my opinion as OSA's opinion - does that make you "cheap and weak"? I don't think so
From what I've seen of some of his posts - they looked liked trolling to me. Doesn't mean that's what he meant
I think open carrying is tactically stupid but to each his own. So, we agree on the issue but disagree with how to go about it
So you painted my opinion as OSA's opinion - does that make you "cheap and weak"? I don't think so
From what I've seen of some of his posts - they looked liked trolling to me. Doesn't mean that's what he meant
I think open carrying is tactically stupid but to each his own. So, we agree on the issue but disagree with how to go about it
I agree. In my opinion that statement shouldn't have even been part of the story. I'm not sure why they even included it other than than to further demonize SB1733.
The only thing common about common sense is that it isn't all that common.
One reason that retention was not written into the new law was because most people didn't want officers arbitrarily deciding what acceptable retention was.
The point I'm trying to make is that anyone's common sense view may not meet with my personal reality. People may not think I need to carry a firearm into a bank, but what they don't know is I may be bringing in a large deposit from a store that might not be in the best part of town. Maybe I am riding a motorcycle and I don't want to leave my firearm in that pesky little compartment while I'm in Wal-Mart, or that compartment is full.
Someone else's "common sense" should not interfere with what is another person is legally allowed to do.
Thank you for responding. Im glad to finally know where you stand on OC. From some of your other posts you seemed to be 100% against it. I agree with you about the people dong it for the shock factor and in my opinion it is the wrong reason to open carry. When I OC its more of a comfort thing for me and when I do OC I avoid crowded places and Im always checking my surroundings. If I carry concealed with my OWB holster I will the majority of the time. But this is just my choice and opinion
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Hartford, CT, Democrat Mayor Denounces Residents Who Are Arming Themselves to Fight Violent Crime- Latest: ConstitutionCowboy
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
