Washington Post Reporter Doesn’t Know ‘Assault Weapons’ Were Legal During Federal Ban

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

RugersGR8

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Messages
32,832
Reaction score
56,424
Location
NW OK
The "crap for brains" lib MSM once again prove, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that their "knowledge?" of both firearms and firearms law is totally null and void/kaput/verboten. Their only agenda(through lies and leftist propaganda) is to confiscate firearms, do away with the 2nd Amendment and to end the ownership of firearms by law abiding citizens. :pissed::censored:


http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...t-reporter-assault-weapons-legal-federal-ban/
Washington Post Reporter Doesn’t Know ‘Assault Weapons’ Were Legal During Federal Ban
by AWR Hawkins 15 Feb 2018

"A Washington Post column calling for the renewal of a federal “assault weapons” ban makes it clear the reporter is unaware that “assault weapons” were legal to purchase, own, and use while the ban was in place."...

..."Later in the article, after stressing that the “assault weapons” ban covered “high capacity” magazines too, Ingraham wrote, “The killers in recent incidents like Las Vegas, Orlando and Sutherland Springs were each able to walk into a gun shop in the days and months before their attacks, and legally purchase their assault weapons and magazines after passing a standard background check. Under an assault weapons ban, that wouldn’t be possible.”...

 

Latest posts

Top Bottom