That isn't even the sense of Ephesians 5: 22. It isn't about one person dominating the other, and the husband is obligated to the woman as well.
Since he was out going for minors, he dang sure wasn't holding up his end of the scripture.
For the record I agree. It's a pretty nice passage in context and its entirety, talking about the obligations spouses have towards each other; it's not a one-sided thing.
Which IMHO makes the whole situation with the politician, the scandal, and the shirt even more ridiculous and grotesque.