Bob... back door deals? I wont say there has never been any of that kind of thing going on.
OK, so we agree on that part.
Most of the bad stuff that gives Unions a bad rap gets you sent to Federal prision these days. In short order.
And a lot of the time it doesn't, it gets your contract settled and you back to work.
YOU really need to look up what defines a conspiracy or collusion. When you make tactics or stategy to win a business plan.... those actions are neither.
How about this one: Practices that eliminate competition, such as collusive bidding, may result in criminal, civil, and/or administrative action against the participants.
www.ustreas.gov/auctions/treasury/rp/generalterms.shtml
When you make agreements that everyone must follow the same rules or not play the game, often at the threat of physical harm, you are 'colluding' according to this definition. Unions attempt to remove any competitive bidding on getting a job done.
You probably should look up what a 'red herring' is in debate. It's an intellectual flaw where the question is asked... answers are made.. and the next question takes a subtle shift off topice... a mental bait and switch.
You saw a red herring? Where? You may disagree with my analogy, or actually my question, about the difference between 'collusion' and what unions do, but you can not call it a red herring. It is very relevant to this discussion. Would you care to answer the question?
It's not becoming... and you really seem to be smarter than that, Bob.
That's the second thing you have said that I agree with. Thank you.