Oklahoma ban on gay marriage ruled unconstitutional

[Seedy]

Seems legit.

 

[inactive]

I'm curious of a few things myself, Old Top. Let's talk about what you look like first, Slick, and what type of women want you.

 

[RidgeHunter]

Why did they have to pick on a decent Christian state?

Decent Christian state? You're hilarious....

Oh c'mon. All our teen pregnancies are immaculate. And please ignore our drug problems, sex crimes, divorce rate, and child abuse/abandonment rates, domestic violence rates, incarceration rates, repeat DUI offenders and the fact I'm from here.

 

[vvvvvvv]

The think is gays never had that right. You cant deny a right they never had. They are granted a new right by judicial activism.

That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever read.

It's very apparent that you don't believe in natural rights, nor do you believe that the Constitution should protect those natural rights equally. You believe that rights come from the government and should only be granted to people that you see as "pure".

 

[LightningCrash]

The think is gays never had that right. You cant deny a right they never had. They are granted a new right by judicial activism. This is why I can respect when voters in a state approve it or when the legislature do it as they are supposed to represent the people.

They had the right before SQ711. Marriage is a common law right, and is anterior to all human law. It can only be removed by force. Which a group of people feigning that they "want to be left alone" did.

Did you have RKBA before the 2A?

 

[Lurker66]

Well there is the slang like "that is so gay". I always took to mean out of the ordinary mainstream.

I would take gay as meaning preferring sexual relations with someone of the same sex and not having interest in the opposite sex.

So in your eyes, being gay, is all about sex? 2 men screwing or 2 women screwing; thats gay in your eyes?

So lets dig a little deeper. In your eyes there are either men or women? What determines being a man or woman? Chromosomes, right? X's and Y's n stuff. Follow me? We'll come back to this in a few, if ya have time.

Ever got a BJ in the dark with your eyes closed? I bet most mouths feel about the same. Same with the anus. Male and female share the same anal structure. In the dark, eyes closed I doubt one wouldnt be much different than the other. Follow me? Now apply this same reasoning with being a hypocrit. If youve had anal sex or got a BJ, youve shared the same basic feeling of being with a guy. Same with giving a woman head...your feeling it just as a lesbian would if shes giving.

 

[vvvvvvv]

because it is clear that the concept of the sanctity of marriage in the eyes of some men has been lost, totally corrupted by the "everyone has rights" wail of liberalism.

So... natural rights should be suppressed or eliminated if they don't line up with certain religious beliefs.

I can think of another part of the world that agrees. We've been bombing the hell out of them.

 

[ignerntbend]

So in your eyes, being gay, is all about sex? 2 men screwing or 2 women screwing; thats gay in your eyes?

So lets dig a little deeper. In your eyes there are either men or women? What determines being a man or woman? Chromosomes, right? X's and Y's n stuff. Follow me? We'll come back to this in a few, if ya have time.

Ever got a BJ in the dark with your eyes closed? I bet most mouths feel about the same. Same with the anus. Male and female share the same anal structure. In the dark, eyes closed I doubt one wouldnt be much different than the other. Follow me? Now apply this same reasoning with being a hypocrit. If youve had anal sex or got a BJ, youve shared the same basic feeling of being with a guy. Same with giving a woman head...your feeling it just as a lesbian would if shes giving.

This is the most reasonable post I've seen on OSA in some time.
Good job.

 

[RidgeHunter]

That's one of the most ignorant things I've ever read.

It's very apparent that you don't believe in natural rights, nor do you believe that the Constitution should protect those natural rights equally. You believe that rights come from the government and should only be granted to people that you see as "pure".

This is a new thing the Foe Intellectual branch of the right follows. Rights come from the government back when it was was small enough not to do something like give us rights that we believe we're retained by the people except when we don't agree with lifestyle hate the sinner not the sin sanctity defintion man and a woman frothy mixture...wait, where was I? Basically, Veggie, they hate 'um some queers and they hate 'um some darkies mixin' with their white women or their half-hispanic women or whatever and stop tryin' to make them justify their queer-hatin' and the FACT that Tom Robinson stole Mayella Ewell's purity. If you need them to explain why their Queer and Darkie hatin' should supersede natural rights (not Opinion Rights, they know all about those), then you're a liberal and probably a queer.

 

[RidgeHunter]

Ever got a BJ in the dark with your eyes closed?

a/s/l???

Also I'm gonna guess if he'd got regular BJs, he'd be a little less worried about this topic.