Posted at a pawn shop I frequent

[Glock 'em down]

Gives the term "Just say no" a whole new meaning, huh?

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

I liked it better before the RKBA was infringed.

Woody

 

[kwaynem]

Must be good stuff huh?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol couldn’t tell ya lol

 

[Tanis143]

Are you a lawyer? Nope. Cable guy.

(Note to self: do not take legal advice from the cable guy).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Common sense my man. How can they prove you had knowledge of the buyer's illicit activities? Unless they can prove you had knowledge of the fact that the buyer uses marijuana how can they convict you of selling a firearm to an individual who was not legally allowed to have one?

 

[nemesis]

Another dope thread, ad nauseam; ad infinitum..

Along with the usual suspects, of course.

People who defend their addictions (and, alcohol is addictive, but those are two separate issues. M'kay?) deliberately ignore what we've learned in this last decade. "What might that be?" you ask?

Four simple words: Denver, Durango, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles and San Fransicko. Well, that's nine words, but you get the point. Their massive tent cities, "homelessness" (aka, bums and addicts) have one thing in common, viz. they're drawn together by narcotics. And those cities are the epicenters of states that legalized recreational marijuana. That's the future of Oklahoma but, hey! As long as you get your fix, it's all good.

But, go ahead and rationalize and justify and smoking that crap.

Because at some point the feds are going to merge the pot cards with the 4470 rolls and, when DC does so, they will come knocking.

Smoking cigarettes is bad, but smoking dope is good? Sounds like the rationale of a degenerate addict.

 

[tRidiot]

Another dope thread, ad nauseam; ad infinitum..

Along with the usual suspects, of course.

People who defend their addictions (and, alcohol is addictive, but those are two separate issues. M'kay?) deliberately ignore what we've learned in this last decade. "What might that be?" you ask?

Four simple words: Denver, Durango, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles and San Fransicko. Well, that's nine words, but you get the point. Their massive tent cities, "homelessness" (aka, bums and addicts) have one thing in common, viz. they're drawn together by narcotics. And those cities are the epicenters of states that legalized recreational marijuana. That's the future of Oklahoma but, hey! As long as you get your fix, it's all good.

But, go ahead and rationalize and justify and smoking that crap.

Because at some point the feds are going to merge the pot cards with the 4470 rolls and, when DC does so, they will come knocking.

Smoking cigarettes is bad, but smoking dope is good? Sounds like the rationale of a degenerate addict.

Dude... weed and/or CBD can fix anything, don't you know?

 

[cm_osu]

Common sense my man. How can they prove you had knowledge of the buyer's illicit activities? Unless they can prove you had knowledge of the fact that the buyer uses marijuana how can they convict you of selling a firearm to an individual who was not legally allowed to have one?

I don't really disagree with you but I'm sure there are alot of people sitting in jail right now that were convinced the police couldn't prove anything.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[TerryMiller]

The legal answer is clear. If they have a MMJ Card and you know about it, it is illegal for them to own firearms or ammunition. Federal laws aren’t kidding around. Transfer a weapon to a pot head in a private sale, and you know said individual is a dope smoker, welp, that’s a violation on your part as well as the doper’s. We don’t have to agree or like it, and many think alcohol is a worse thing than pot, but booze is legal and pot isn’t; so say the Feds. Best plan is to not smoke dope and talk about it, not smoke dope and have weapons and ammo ( and talk about it) and maybe to decide which you’d rather have; guns and ammo or marijuana.

Now, some of the members here use drugs much more powerful than marijuana. Opioid pain relievers, for example. But opioids are legal, according to the feds, if prescribed, and may make you see snakes with funny hats and have bad dreams about fat bald headed clowns with lots of teeth but you can still own weaponry. But puff a joint (and chill out as I understand) which (so I hear), mellows you out, (I’ve been told) and you’re a hardened criminal bound for the federal pen.

Back many moons ago (like in the late '70's), my father-in-law had me quit harvesting milo to guide some "friends" when they wanted to hunt Pheasants. Sadly, in addition to the 3 "friends," we also ended up with 4 OKC dudes as well. Stopped at the first field and one of them says, "Yep, they are here. I can see one." I walked around the corner and all I saw was a hawk, so I asked if that was what he was referring to.

Next field we get to, said 4 dudes from OKC get out of their pickup with beers in their hands. I informed them that if they wanted to have me guiding them, they would have to ditch the beer. They literally poured out their remaining cans into the ditch.

I never did appreciate quitting the harvesting to lead those fools around. The 3 "friends" were OK, but the 4 dudes weren't.

 

[Tanis143]

Another dope thread, ad nauseam; ad infinitum..

Along with the usual suspects, of course.

People who defend their addictions (and, alcohol is addictive, but those are two separate issues. M'kay?) deliberately ignore what we've learned in this last decade. "What might that be?" you ask?

Four simple words: Denver, Durango, Seattle, Portland, Los Angeles and San Fransicko. Well, that's nine words, but you get the point. Their massive tent cities, "homelessness" (aka, bums and addicts) have one thing in common, viz. they're drawn together by narcotics. And those cities are the epicenters of states that legalized recreational marijuana. That's the future of Oklahoma but, hey! As long as you get your fix, it's all good.

But, go ahead and rationalize and justify and smoking that crap.

Because at some point the feds are going to merge the pot cards with the 4470 rolls and, when DC does so, they will come knocking.

Smoking cigarettes is bad, but smoking dope is good? Sounds like the rationale of a degenerate addict.

So many falsehoods in this post. Let me simplify the answer though:

No study has actually said pot is a gateway drug anymore than any study has proven banning the AR15 will make us safer.
Socialist policies have ruined the 6 cities you mentioned, not the fact that weed was legalized.
Rationalize it? How about compare it to drinking alcohol. Some people can partake in alcohol without having any problems, others abuse it.

Do I do it? No, simply for the fact that if I get tested by my work I'm fired. And I can get tested for anything, even if I'm not at fault. However I have used it in the past and I found I prefer it over getting drunk (my 1st year of college before I went to West Point). I have nothing against people who use it medicinally or recreationally, as long as they do it responsibly. The only real social impact it has is the fact so many people end up in prison for possession or sales. You don't see people stealing for a marijuana addiction, those are generally addicted to other drugs like coke, heroin and meth.

 

[tRidiot]

The only real social impact it has is the fact so many people end up in prison for possession or sales.

I'll strongly disagree with you there. 100%.