One World Government?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mightymouse

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
8,638
Reaction score
3,878
Location
Lawton
There is not a person in the world stupid enough to want to run the whole world (one world government). Think of the problem of running just one country, then multiply that by all the nations of the world--again, there is not a person (or persons) stupid enough to want to take on that kind of responsibility.
 

chuter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Messages
5,325
Reaction score
7,747
Location
over yonder
There is not a person in the world stupid enough to want to run the whole world (one world government). Think of the problem of running just one country, then multiply that by all the nations of the world--again, there is not a person (or persons) stupid enough to want to take on that kind of responsibility.
I disagree. I think you're correct in that there is no one who values responsibility that would want that position, but I think there are plenty of people whose ego and lust for power absolutely over rule any sense of responsibility they might feel.
 

MaddSkillz

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
10,543
Reaction score
618
Location
Jenks
They're trying and have been for decades... I'd say the catalyst was the removal of the gold standard and then the assassination of JFK. If they would have continued on a slow, methodical timeline I think they would have pulled it off... However, due to them hitting the fast-forward button promptly after Trump surprised them and won the first time, all they've done is created an environment for populism to spread like wild-fire. It's growing fast and people are fed up of government controlling absolutely everything. The pandemic and now the clearly fraudulent election results have made people dig their heels in and rightfully so. The globalists won't be successful.
 

ConstitutionCowboy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
6,288
Reaction score
5,188
Location
Kingfisher County
Can you imagine the size of the force that would be required to enforce a "one world government?" First off, it couldn't be accurately called a government. It would be some form of dictatorship. Such a dictatorship would have to employ tyrannical despotism to keep its brand of "order" and to secure its hold. Then you would need a force comprised of loyalists to keep the big force in line.

No one is going to volunteer to submit to such a dictatorship. Not only that, I seriously doubt any force could be so overwhelming that the whole world could be conquered. Think of the logistics involved. Think of the material support that would be required. It would require slavery - slavery of everyone not in any position of power in the dictatorship.

No, it would soon collapse under its own weight, and the damage it would inflict just to set itself up in power would be catastrophic to all that has been built that such a dictatorship covets and needs to sustain itself and all those who have been enslaved - let alone the needs of the hordes of enforcers it requires. All this said, there are still those who would attempt to impose such a one world ruling dictatorship. Arrogance and grandeur abound in such people. Our task is to prevent any such dictatorship form succeeding from the git-go.

Here is a clue: No armed society has ever been enslaved without first being disarmed. Here is another clue: Any attempt to disarm the people is the first step toward dictatorship. Even if those attempting to disarm the people are deluded into thinking disarmament would lead to some measure of safety are only making it possible for someone else to drop the hammer unhindered.

Regardless of who or why anyone wants to disarm you of any measure of arms, do not allow it. Your life, your freedom, your property, and that of all those you love will be placed in jeopardy if you comply.

Woody

"Knowing the past, I'll not surrender any arms and march less prepared into the future." B.E.Wood
 

gerhard1

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
4,555
Reaction score
3,510
Location
Enid, OK
That might explain all the threads about the UN Troops and the “camps” that were being built during Obummers rule. If this were to happen, WHO would lead this rodeo to be the dominator of the world?
Those stories of the FEMA camps that were here right now, were easily debunked. There was one alleged to be at Tonkawa at the site of a WWII PoW camp. I drove over and there was nothing there. There was another near Concordia, Kansas, and one day, as I drove past, I looked and found nothing there. Using google maps and google earth, I looked at other locations and again found nothing.

There were supposed to be bar-coded stickers on the back of road signs that told the Blue Helmets where they were and a bunch of other stuff. One day, as I was walking past a sign I looked at the sticker on the back and found the nefarious sticker. It told when the sign had been put up.

This nonsense has been going on since the Clinton administration, and possibly Bush 41.
 

TedKennedy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
11,409
Reaction score
12,869
Location
Tulsa
Those stories of the FEMA camps that were here right now, were easily debunked. There was one alleged to be at Tonkawa at the site of a WWII PoW camp. I drove over and there was nothing there. There was another near Concordia, Kansas, and one day, as I drove past, I looked and found nothing there. Using google maps and google earth, I looked at other locations and again found nothing.

There were supposed to be bar-coded stickers on the back of road signs that told the Blue Helmets where they were and a bunch of other stuff. One day, as I was walking past a sign I looked at the sticker on the back and found the nefarious sticker. It told when the sign had been put up.

This nonsense has been going on since the Clinton administration, and possibly Bush 41.

Yeah, but people are suckers. Lots of stories about camps turned out to be pure nonsense, yet some folks still cling to it.
 

saltydog

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 1, 2007
Messages
358
Reaction score
167
Location
Tulsa Oklahoma
Someone here posted that 70,000,000 people voted for socialism in this country. I can easily see a one world dictator when that many people, in such a free country, want to give it up. :coffee2:
 

John6185

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
9,412
Reaction score
9,782
Location
OKC
If, per chance that the potential dictators were lined up, who would you suppose would be at the front? Who do other nations adore? Obama strikes me as the one they would choose and "the glove fits." Some people in the US would jump at the chance to surrender everything for socialism. And Hollywood?
Jamie Foxx Blasphemously Calls Obama "God and Our Lord and ...
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom