...and the 700 miles per tank doesn't mean diddly when you compare 2 vehicles with 2 different size fuel tanks. Of course if your diesel has a 25-30 gal tank, and your gasser has a 20-25 gal tank, you are going to get more miles out of that tank, even with only slightly higher MPG because there's more fuel. You have to compare cost per mile in the two.
Current rates I saw @ my last fill up (Friday 1/31/14):
Gas: $3.02/gal
Diesel: $3.40/gal
Eco-Boost rating from Ford's webiste: 22MPG Highway 22MPG@$3.02/gal= $0.1372/per mile
Dodge rating per the article at 28MPG Highway 28MPG@$3.40/gal= $0.1214/per mile
Not much of a direct difference in price per mile. I think you'll get better life out of the diesel than the gas. You will very rarely get a long life out of a gas fed turbo engine in comparison to a diesel, the high rpm's required to make power in the gasser are any enemy to longevity.
I personally know of no one that can get 22 mpg with the EB. The guys I know that have them get around 17 and horrific while towing. Don't believe me, read here http://www.f150forum.com/f70/ecoboost-only-real-world-mileage-87559/index341/
Now the Ram has not been EPA rated yet but in all of the testing done by various automotive testers, the ecodiesel has gotten a max of around 28 and averaged about 25 in mixed driving. We don't know the real world MPGs yet but this is the best information we have to work with.
If Ram can actually deliver these MPGs then they are going to have a huge advantage over the Ford ecoboost which advertises big numbers but fails to deliver.
Are guys really getting 22mpg out of their ecoboosts? Just curious. I'll be looking for something by the end of the year, and all fo this interests me.
If the diesel wasn't shrouded by the Dodge name, I would think about it. They would have to have an IRON CLAUDE b2b warranty for me to even think twice about them.
Funny, I have the same feelings about Ford. Had to put waaaay too much money in repairs to a truck that never really did any real work. Ram has been good to me so far. Really good when you count the work trucks that get some heavy, daily abuse.
Working off the 17, and calling it an even 18, @ $3.02/gal, you are looking at $0.167777/per mile, which equates to a difference in $4.63 in fuel per 100 miles, or $46 (half a tank of fuel) over 1k miles. Really not THAT much of a difference for a highway driver between the two. The gains of one over the other will come from towing, or if a person lets the truck idle frequently (IE a work truck). (This is the difference in 28 MPG vs 18 MPG) Over the life, say 100k miles, j. So unless it's something you are going to be towing with, using for work, or are planning on keeping for the long haul (100k +), the MPG between the two shouldn't make the decision for you. It should be more on a what you like basis.
If the diesel wasn't shrouded by the Dodge name, I would think about it. They would have to have an IRON CLAUDE b2b warranty for me to even think twice about them.
I'll stick to my older bow ties for my trucks for the time being. I have 314k on my current bow tie, and still going strong, minus some ugly interior, lol.
Fiat makes the engine. It has been in Europe for many years.
Enter your email address to join: