Too bad you didn't read what I wrote:
"So, he was what most schools call an adjunct. Thanks for confirming that."
I didn't ignore what they said, it just wasn't relevant to what I wrote.
"So, he was what most schools call an adjunct. Thanks for confirming that."
I didn't ignore what they said, it just wasn't relevant to what I wrote.
Senior Lecturer and Adjunct are two very different ranks/positions.
If you have a Senior Lecturer position, yes. I haven't done an exhaustive search, so perhaps I shouldn't have said "most," but the law schools at OU, OCU, Tulsa, and Texas A&M don't have a lecturer or senior lecturer position, and would call his equivalent position an adjunct.
Either way, he was only a "part-time teacher," as S4F posted.
No, they wouldn't call any Senior Lecturer an Adjunct, regardless of whether they do/don't have that rank at their own university. Some Senior Lecturers are full-time, and some are part-time, but that has no bearing on their rank. Many of the best professors/teachers/lecturers/etc. are part-time by choice because they are involved with other important things, and the fact that they remain part-time doesn't have any bearing on anything. It, literally, doesn't matter in the context of academia. So, what is the point?
38% of Florida voters think Cruz could be the Zodiac Killer http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2016/02...ruz-could-be-the-Zodiac-Killer/4771456519542/
No shite. Did you see that booger on his lip at the debate last night? Boogergate!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was torn until Cruz cast his lot with the FBI against Apple. Then I realized that he really didn't care about the 4th as much as he claimed. In my book, that makes him the same as Rubio with respect to the 4th. Given that I like Rubio's approach to immigration better, he gets my support until he drops out.
I'll take countries to move to for $5,000.00 Alex.
Similar threads
