Agreed. If the company proceeds decently, you're better off without a lawyer. Even if a lawyer only took 25%, that's still a big chunk. PI is where the big money is; straight-up property damage is pretty easy to handle, and in a collision with a house, there's not really even a way for them to try to blame you ("the house came out of nowhere!").In my experience with claims I'd say an attorney may be needed eventually if the insurance company isn't moving forward on repairs. But if there's no personal injury, the better bet may be a public adjuster or good (as in, experienced handling homeowners/property damage claims) general contractor. There's no additional money to be made without personal injury, but there's things to look out for on property damage such as contents, betterment/RCV vs ACV, ALE (loss of use, or temporary living expense), meals if displaced from living in residence, etc...
But then that depends entirely on how the claim and repairs end up going. Likely won't need either if the company knows what the damage is and how to pay for it properly.