Anyone have any comments on the Taurus 709? Saw one at the gun show and really like it. Looks like a good little concealed 9mm. Want to get some feedback on it before buying.
Thanks,
fjtiii
Thanks,
fjtiii
couldnt look more like a glock26 if it tried, im not a big glock fan but i would pick glock over a taurus any day...(my opionon)
What in today's offerings are so different from the 90s that they make the Glock "suck nards?" The only serious competitors to the Glock I can think of are the XD and M&P. And the XD is a good gun, but does NOT make the Glock look bad. And the M&P is a great gun; yes, but still not enough to put the Glock out of the running either. What do either of those do that the Glock does not, other than different ergonomics? In fact, I prefer the grip angle of the Glock. It is much more similar to the grip angle for the revolvers I also like.
I'd pick pretty much any gun over a glock (except Hi-point, etc.) - BTDT; had many and they suck nards compared to today's offerings. In the 90s, they were a decently innovative pistol for the price. Now, they're just about the worst price-to-performance/innovation/features/fit & finish ratio you can find out there. Unless a serious injury left your wrist cocked in a permanently downward fashion, which would be compensated by the freakish upward grip angle they put into their pistols for some reason.
Several guns have the European grip
I'm curious - what gun do you consider as a good price-to-performance/innovation/features/fit & finish ratio?
Enter your email address to join: