Just need your opinion on this

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Should a licensed bail bonds man should be able to openly carry when casing fugitive

  • Yes

    Votes: 29 40.8%
  • No

    Votes: 37 52.1%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 5 7.0%

  • Total voters
    71
  • Poll closed .

rlongnt

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2006
Messages
4,415
Reaction score
3,586
Location
Edmond
If they have a CCW permit... You bet!

If you are not an LEO I think you need a permit just like the rest of the world. It is no big deal to get so just do it.
 

bsdubois00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
Location
Norman
I have to agree.... everyone should be able to bare arms....

it is our constitutional right

I agree everyone has the right to bare arms. But what gives said person the right to openly bring a gun onto someone's property and force them to come with them because they skipped bail. Wouldn't this be the same as a cop?

I think if that's the case I should be able to openly carry my gun with me and force my renters to pay me rent when they are 2 days late.

It's the fact that a) you will have a ton of untrained bondsman out there with guns on them thinking they can use them to enforce the law (they are bondsman not police officers) and b) you will be willingly going onto private property with your weapon using it as a sign of force (whether or not you even take it out the holster) when all you are is a public civilian with a bondsman license not an officer of the law.

Just curious here - what rights does a bondsman have to go onto/into private property to go after a subject that skipped?
 

jeffsoward

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Messages
3,244
Reaction score
3
Location
OKC, OK
I agree everyone has the right to bare arms. But what gives said person the right to openly bring a gun onto someone's property and force them to come with them because they skipped bail. Wouldn't this be the same as a cop?

I think if that's the case I should be able to openly carry my gun with me and force my renters to pay me rent when they are 2 days late.

It's the fact that a) you will have a ton of untrained bondsman out there with guns on them thinking they can use them to enforce the law (they are bondsman not police officers) and b) you will be willingly going onto private property with your weapon using it as a sign of force (whether or not you even take it out the holster) when all you are is a public civilian with a bondsman license not an officer of the law.

Just curious here - what rights does a bondsman have to go onto/into private property to go after a subject that skipped?

In the United States legal system, the 1873 U.S. Supreme Court case Taylor v. Taintor, 16 Wall (83 U.S. 366, 21 L.Ed. 287), is cited as having established that the person into whose custody an accused is remanded as part of the accuser's bail has sweeping rights to recover that person.

Here you go.
 

MaddSkillz

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 19, 2007
Messages
10,543
Reaction score
618
Location
Jenks
"Shall not be infringed" is really not that difficult to understand.

Edit: Under current laws, I really don't know... I'm just saying in a most perfect, Constitutional world, yeah, they should.
 

BadgeBunny

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 5, 2007
Messages
38,213
Reaction score
15
Location
Port Charles
I think they are using an old law that gives them powers even cops don't have, to break in and arrest.
0352Marine knows more about that.

That could be.

I guess my deal is that everyone makes mistakes (just look at the errors the police departments make) and because I KNOW that I don't have anything that needs to be repossessed or any outstanding warrants, the logical thing for me to think if they come tearing into my house is "home invasion".
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom