If this farce of a government really gave a damn about stopping terrorism that affects the lives of Americans, they'd have already sent Seal Team Six into Goldman Sachs.
We entered Afghanistan in order to kick Al-Qaida out of the safe-havens they had in Afghanistan and to install and build up a native Afghan government more amenable to keeping A-Q out in the future. The Taliban were given the opportunity to simply throw out or hand over A-Q before we invaded. They were unwilling, or unable, or both and suffered the consequence.
And to actually put in perspective:
US Combat Deaths in OEF (Afghanistan) - 1906
US Combat Deaths in Vietnam: ~47,000
US Combat Deaths in Korea: ~34,000
US Combat deaths in WW-II (all theaters): ~290,000
Deaths from the Pearl Harbor attack: 2117
Deaths per year from gun shots (total accidents/crimes etc) in the US ~30,000
Deaths from auto accidents (avg over 2001-2010) ~40,000 per year
We can and should debate any US engagement in conflicts anywhere. However, the war in AFG (and even in both AFG and IRQ) were neither unaffordable in terms of treasure nor unsustainable in human terms especially compared to what we have endured before. The War on Terror was affordable - however, we, as a nation, chose not to pay for it but to run deficits instead so that we wouldn't have to cut any social spending or raise taxes. There was logic to the decision but it had consequences and we are living with them now. Nothing was inevitable it was all a matter of choices and consequences.
Enter your email address to join: