You've obviously forgotten that they didn't build that.
Well said.
You've obviously forgotten that they didn't build that.
Not for that, just to make it clear that they are assuming liability for my safety when they deny me the ability to defend myself. I'm not sure that a new law is actually needed for the liability issue (see below), but it would certainly clarify the issue.So we need the government to pass a law that infringes on business owners/private property rights in order to protect our right to carry?
Not for that, just to make it clear that they are assuming liability for my safety when they deny me the ability to defend myself. I'm not sure that a new law is actually needed for the liability issue (see below), but it would certainly clarify the issue.
Why should a business/private property owner be liable for your willful decision to disarm and enter an establishment? It's private property. You do not have a right or critical necessity to be there in the first place.
So we need the government to pass a law that infringes on business owners/private property rights in order to protect our right to carry?
How 'bout this. If place is posted and it really bothers you...wait for it...Go do business somewhere else.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'd guess that the legal concept of assuming liability for the safety of the guests on your premises is based on the ancient custom of assuming liability for protecting your guests. That one, I'm pretty certain, is as old as civilization itself.Why should a business/private property owner be liable for your willful decision to disarm and enter an establishment? It's private property. You do not have a right or critical necessity to be there in the first place.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'd guess that the legal concept of assuming liability for the safety of the guests on your premises is based on the ancient custom of assuming liability for protecting your guests. That one, I'm pretty certain, is as old as civilization itself.
Why should a business/private property owner be liable for your willful decision to disarm and enter an establishment? It's private property. You do not have a right or critical necessity to be there in the first place.
I'm not a lawyer, but I'd guess that the legal concept of assuming liability for the safety of the guests on your premises is based on the ancient custom of assuming liability for protecting your guests. That one, I'm pretty certain, is as old as civilization itself.
Liability from negligent accidents and unsafe physical conditions is one thing, but requiring an armed guard or suing someone for a random criminal act occurring on the premises is another.
I still don't understand why some think the right to bear arms trumps a private property owner's rights...nobody is forcing you to go in there so why should they be liable for protecting you? Private property rights are just as sacred as 2nd Amendment rights IMHO.
I consider the "No Firearms" sign the same as an "Enter at your own risk" sign...
Same here.
Concealed is concealed.
Enter your email address to join: