And right after our Founding fathers fought off the Brits, we had to go to war and fight off the Muslims who were pirating our trade and holding our ship's crews for ransom.
Woody
And right after our Founding fathers fought off the Brits, we had to go to war and fight off the Muslims who were pirating our trade and holding our ship's crews for ransom.
Woody
Bosch Fawstin is a former Muslim. He did this to "illustrate" (pun intended) Islamic intolerance.
Woody, your "truth" is skewed. Many mooslims don't care what you think of their religion. That's truth. You blab on about muslims and sharia like it's all over Logan county. I doubt yall have any mosques in your neck of the woods.
If it wasn't for idiots like Gellar, we wouldn't be talking about a shooting in Texas.
As a Navy vet, surely you know the history of pirating, hostages, impressment and ransoms......mooslims were not the first, worst, last or most. Beside we fought that War long before steel ships.
Find a better reason to hate mooslims.
And Gellars or anyone else's right to free speech ends when they put other people's lives in danger.
Right are individual "things".....when a group, such as Gellars contestants, endangers those in the community, her rights cease to a certain extent. If she wants to invoke her right to free speech cool, let her draw lil allah cartoons, then if she wins stupid prizes, it's on her......but if her cartoon contest provokes a bomb blast that kills hundreds near the the show, she has overstepped her bounds.
If her and others like her, provoke mooslims to the extent our Nation goes to war for attacks, that's kinda where her rights stop and the Nation's rights begin.[/QUOTE]
Once again expressing our fear of muslims. Geller DID NOT put anyone in danger. The muslims did. She did not provoke muslims, they didn't even attend the show to determine if the displays were offensive. At what point do we blame muslims? Oh, nevermind, blaming muslims might anger them.
So if a woman dresses in a short skirt, fishnets, hooker heels and is showing off a remarkable rack, is she provoking rape?
So radical extremists going to Garland armed and actually attempting to shoot people because someone offended their religious sensibilities isn't an effort to push their ideas on non-muslims by force? Or would it have been a case of the Baltimorians bringing it on themselves by exercising their right to protest even when they knew it might be provocative?
I can't see how it can be both ways - either we acknowledge the right to freedom of speech to those with whom we disagree or else we forfeit our own right to speak up when we find ourselves in disagreement.
If it weren't for muslims, we wouldn't be talking about a shooting in Texas.
Evidently, that is the case.
I aint gonna banter back n forth with you unless you can give 1 legitimate argument on how Gellars contest did anything but serve a hateful purpose and almost got lotsa people killed.
Try real hard, please, otherwise you ain't contributing anything but how women should dress.
