We desperately need to replace the current system with something much more protective of individual liberty.
How do we do this?
We desperately need to replace the current system with something much more protective of individual liberty.
Creating disregard for lawful authority is exactly what I am trying to encourage. The only thing people should have regard for is good old fashioned morality, including the Non-Aggression Principle... and they should not be afraid to defy a law when it comes into conflict therewith.
Break down the system and replace it? That is absolutely my goal. We desperately need to replace the current system with something much more protective of individual liberty.
I'm not taking anything off the table, and I'm open to ideas... but I submit that the best starting point is to spread the mindset that laws are nothing but threats of force, and are not due any more reverence or respect than any other such threat. We need to break the tie that binds law and morality in so many people's minds, and get people to realize that threats of force are only justified if made against someone who first started the use or threat thereof; that there is nothing special about a threat of force when it is made by a majority vote of a bunch of suit-wearing sociopaths, or anybody else; that, as one member recently put it (sorry, I forget who) that malium prohibitum is malium in se.How do we do this?
I think I'll start today by leaving my driveway without putting my seat belt on... we'll see where it goes from there. Actually on second thought, I'm pretty sure this shitter I'm sitting on isn't EPA-compliant, so maybe the revolution has already begun.Brilliant. I'm curious which laws do we need to disregard first to create your utopian anarchist world?
I think I'll start today by leaving my driveway without putting my seat belt on... we'll see where it goes from there. Actually on second thought, I'm pretty sure this shitter I'm sitting on isn't EPA-compliant, so maybe the revolution has already begun.
Now that's what I call living on the edge with your tender parts dangling over a non-compliant commode...fight the power, brother!!!
I'm not taking anything off the table, and I'm open to ideas... but I submit that the best starting point is to spread the mindset that laws are nothing but threats of force, and are not due any more reverence or respect than any other such threat. We need to break the tie that binds law and morality in so many people's minds, and get people to realize that threats of force are only justified if made against someone who first started the use or threat thereof; that there is nothing special about a threat of force when it is made by a majority vote of a bunch of suit-wearing sociopaths, or anybody else; that, as one member recently put it (sorry, I forget who) that malium prohibitum is malium in se.
In the longer run, we can start removing the laws that most egregiously violate the non-aggression principle, or disregarding them in great enough numbers that they become moot; and advocating for more legal protection for individual liberty. Taking a look at the hyper-regulatory state around us, I think it is clear that the Constitution didn't go nearly far enough toward protecting liberty.
I think I'll start today by leaving my driveway without putting my seat belt on... we'll see where it goes from there. Actually on second thought, I'm pretty sure this shitter I'm sitting on isn't EPA-compliant, so maybe the revolution has already begun.
Never mind in this day and age even "ordinary" folks feel like they don't have to do what any nice police officer asks them even if it is for their own safety.
Enter your email address to join: