You know, I think it's kinda funny. Years ago, tats were a sign of one's "originality", but of course damn near everyone has 'em....so the few of us out there that have NONE are the OG's now. Funny how that works.
What I meant was I don't understand people thinking that it's a "vice"..... or why some think someone is on welfare because they have ink. Outdated thinking to say the least for reasons you just described.