I don't really commit crimes, so i don't really care who has access to it to be honest.
Go Google "false positive." Then imagine being in a database and having a suspect sample erroneously match you in, say, a murder investigation.
I don't really commit crimes, so i don't really care who has access to it to be honest.
I took one of these tests...the results said I've been missing from the zoo for a few weeks and they sent animal control to my house. WTF??
Go Google "false positive." Then imagine being in a database and having a suspect sample erroneously match you in, say, a murder investigation.
97% European
- 61% British Isles
- 32% Western and Central Europe
- 2% Southern Europe
- 2% Eastern Europe
1% Middle Eastern
- 1% Eastern Middle East
1% New World
- 1% Native American
1% East Asian
- 1% Northeast Asia
I started with Ancestry but then sent my results to FTDNA for additional analysis - this is how they report the results:
97% European 97%
- 61% British Isles
- 32% Western and Central Europe
- 2% Southern Europe
- 2% Eastern Europe
1% Middle Eastern
- 1% Eastern Middle East
1% New World
- 1% Native American
1% East Asian
- 1% Northeast Asia
It's especially interesting to me as an adoptee.
Mostly similar. I think Ancestry may be a bit overly enthusiastic in attempting to pinpoint specific locations, but nothing that would make me suspect either evaluation is inaccurate.How did your ancestry results compare?
Africa < 1%
Trace Regions < 1%
Mali < 1%
America 1%
Trace Regions 1%
Native American 1%
Europe 97%
Great Britain 30%
Ireland 26%
Italy/Greece 15%
Scandinavia 11%
Europe West 9%
Trace Regions 6%
Iberian Peninsula 5%
European Jewish < 1%
Pacific Islander < 1%
Trace Regions < 1%
Melanesia < 1%
Enter your email address to join: