Only if you believe that there is no separation between legality and morality. Personally, I choose to believe in a fixed moral code.
Only if you believe that there is no separation between legality and morality. Personally, I choose to believe in a fixed moral code.
Are you trying to suggest that the only ones on this piece of land called the United States of America legally are the Indians?
Which one? Mankind has made up so many to choose from.
Are you?
Not at all. In fact if it weren't for the european settlers and their technology, this country would still be made up of nomadic tribes living in animal hide shelters. I read your posts and do my best to move on as fast as possible. I don't understand you at all. Either you are an instigator who doesn't have much more to do then get under others skin, or you truly believe in the liberal-progressive movement. Either way, it's a view with which I disagree. After reading a few of your posts, I figured you were an Indian who believed all were here illegally.
Just wondering...
Well, since you asked...I have plenty to do and I do believe in some of the liberal-progressive movement, just as I believe in some of the conservative movement.
Continue to read my posts. You may find enlightenment.
I don't believe that any creation of mankind is truly fixed.
JB Books said:
From reading your posts I believe you believe in whatever is making you the most money....
Some lawyers can afford not to care.
About the difference between legal and illegal? Are you saying money trumps the law and justice? Please enlighten us.
Yeah but like illegal immigration a certain group decided it would be better to not enforce that law and have no-fault divorce since it created a new industry and enriched that certain group.
And where did the idea of no-fault divorce come from? Did it really come from Lenin and his "Destroy the family, and you destroy society" theroy? And what has it done for America's children, families, and our nation as a whole?
Excerpt...
Study claims ‘no-fault’ divorce costs Florida taxpayers almost $2 billion per year as an intramural team charges that the state’s laws violate Constitutional protections and due process.
“Every divorce filed is granted; none are judicially denied,” Dr. Lawson explained. “In 1971, when state legislators changed the laws, they decided to nullify the existing defenses and leave the accused party without any means of rebuttal.”
“The evidence shows that the plaintiff wins every time. That’s not how it’s supposed to work in our courts,” Dr. Lawson said.
In light of the growing body of research documenting the harmful effects of divorce laws - on children in particular - Dr. Lawson has taken her concerns to top state officials. Her authoritative report entitled “The Effects of Divorce on America,” co-authored by team member Patrick Fagan, presents statistical evidence of the harm caused to five core institutions: family, Church, school, government and the economic market place. Another facet of her research has highlighted the increasingly large financial burden that divorce rates have created for taxpayers.
Further evidence supporting the need for an investigation was released on April 15th, at the National Press Club in Washington, by David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for American Values. He presented a report called “The Taxpayer Costs of Divorce and Unwed Childbearing: First-Ever Estimates for the Nation and all 50 States.” The ground-breaking study estimates for the first time the enormous economic costs per year of this problem - $112 Billion nationwide, and almost $2 billion for the State of Florida alone.
According to researchers, the 'no-fault' law was first deceptively sold as a ‘mutual agreement’ process – and most people still believe that both parties must 'agree.'
“America’s top attorneys, whom were members of the Bar’s Uniform Law Commission, quietly designed these laws in 1965, and reached full implementation in 1974 with the publication of the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act,” explained Michael Ross, president of the Family Rights Coalition. “The key leadership of this project proceeded with full awareness of Lenin’s attempt to implement ‘no-fault’ divorce laws after the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. In trying to topple the social order, and eliminate governmental opposition, Lenin successfully laid the groundwork for a social order that was destined to ultimate failure.”
http://www.libertysentinel.org/article.php?id=DivorceLaws
Similar threads
