It depends on what I know about what is going on ... I don't just automatically say "HEY!! He's the DA (or he's the defense attorney) so he must be right ..."
Well i'm going to have to go with the defense since i still believe that you are innocent til proven guilty and also i know how our DA thinks, Everyone is guilty til proven innocent and all should hang no matter what you did just to get a feather in his tail so he can strut around.
Neither.
Seriously.
Seriously.
Neither. DA's have been proven to procecute according to how the community they serve in will re-elect them.
Neither... DAs can be complete idiots.... just like the accused.
I don't side with either. They are crooks. I sometimes don't know how someone could be a defense attorney or a DA? Money I guess. I know I could never represent someone I knew was probably guilty. I don't care how much money I made. Picture representing Charles Manson.
Exactly. Have to weigh what we know. Jumping to conclusions is never good.
Sent from NSA wire tapped device.
Unless you take a government contract or work as a public defender, you aren't going to be forced to represent anyone. Don't like the client? Don't take him. There are plenty of ways someone can run afoul of the state that I'd have no problem defending.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Similar threads
