Connecting the dots will lead you to the facts. If you refuse to see the facts I can't help you.
Attempting to connect dots, or things that look like dots, from a prejudicial viewpoint can lead you to a picture that looks like a donkey too. If you refuse to acknowledge that you don't know the facts, you can't be helped either.
Large, agitated male chasing a female through a parking lot at night, after a reported physical altercation...male refuses commands from responding LEOs who are attempting to identify everyone involved (think the cops shouldn't have asked for ID? I sure hope they ask for ID the next time some guy is chasing my wife through a parking lot instead of taking "but officer that's my wife" as proof of no wrong doing)...fight ensues...agitated, combative male dies of cardiac arrest as a result of fight.
Any facts in there? Nope, but it's an alternative version that someone with an open mind would have to admit is just as plausible as the "5 cops just showed up and beat this guy to death for no reason" scenario, at least until everything comes out on the table.