Hmmm so no warrent equals good shoot
warrent gone wrong equals payoff
.Nothing was found in either case, somehow ...this is wrong
Seems to be a problem somewhere huh?
Hmmm so no warrent equals good shoot
warrent gone wrong equals payoff
.Nothing was found in either case, somehow ...this is wrong
did someone really post this post?
does someone really care if this post was posted?
does anyone know its Not true?
has any other topic been argued without ALL the facts?
Really?
Quote Originally Posted by RickN View Post
1) Did the LEO really shoot the dog?
2) With nobody home, do we know if the dog tried to attack the LEO and he fired to protect himself?
3) How do we know any of this is true?
4) Does anyone just have to post any bad story about cops for most of you to jump on the "Cop is guilty" bandwagon?
Quote Originally Posted by EhlerDave View Post
These questions are just what I was going to ask.
Is this a problem? Do I need to explain the post? I have spare time, feel free to ask if it is confusing.
My apologys , are You confused , Im posting the same thing you are.
No I really Dont have time to keep repeating myself, and im not used to doing that, so , No Thanks..
Enter your email address to join: