Rubio or Cruz?

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Ace_on_the_Turn

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
3,775
Reaction score
418
Location
OKC
Your BS doesn't change the fact that he will go down in history as the worst president in the history of the country, even topping Fillmore.

Not. Even. Close. Not even the worst of this century. Here's a hint, just for you. Stop believing the lies. Just stop. It's almost embarrassing how stupid of a comment that is.

The only measure that will put Obama in even the lower half of presidents is in the minds of people like you. Historians, scholars, people that actually know what they are talking about, unlike you, will never list Obama below the likes of Bush Jr or Nixon. And those are just recent examples.

New ranking of U.S. presidents puts Lincoln at No. 1, Obama at 18; Kennedy judged most overrated

This all puts Obama at least in the second tier (Hanson through Eisenhower), but probably not in the first and clearly above the third. This thus ranks Obama somewhere between fourth and twelfth. Only a few in the second tier faced a tide of circumstances equal to what Obama has managed which puts Obama somewhere toward the top of the second tier.

And the de facto presidential ranker, Siena college who's ranking is "based on responses from 238 presidential scholars, historians and political scientists", ranks Obama as 15th.

The current president, Barack Obama...enters the survey in the 15th position

But, you know facts and stuff...
 

Shootin 4 Fun

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
17,852
Reaction score
1,103
Location
Bixby
You're wrong. Obama was neither unqualified to be POTUS nor was he a bad candidate.

Nice try, but your demagoguery doesn't change the truth.

Oh bull. Obama never held a job and was a freshman senator. A truly qualified candidate will have served in the military and worked in the private sector.
 
Last edited:

71buickfreak

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
4,790
Reaction score
30
Location
stillwater
Not. Even. Close. Not even the worst of this century. Here's a hint, just for you. Stop believing the lies. Just stop. It's almost embarrassing how stupid of a comment that is.

The only measure that will put Obama in even the lower half of presidents is in the minds of people like you. Historians, scholars, people that actually know what they are talking about, unlike you, will never list Obama below the likes of Bush Jr or Nixon. And those are just recent examples.

New ranking of U.S. presidents puts Lincoln at No. 1, Obama at 18; Kennedy judged most overrated

This all puts Obama at least in the second tier (Hanson through Eisenhower), but probably not in the first and clearly above the third. This thus ranks Obama somewhere between fourth and twelfth. Only a few in the second tier faced a tide of circumstances equal to what Obama has managed which puts Obama somewhere toward the top of the second tier.

And the de facto presidential ranker, Siena college who's ranking is "based on responses from 238 presidential scholars, historians and political scientists", ranks Obama as 15th.

The current president, Barack Obama...enters the survey in the 15th position

But, you know facts and stuff...

Yep,. gosh darn facts- http://www.usatoday.com/story/theov...bush-quinnipiac-poll-reagan-clinton/11985837/
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom