Where do you get the idea that they do not know what life is li,e in any given store?
Yep, agree completely. Automobile engineers should be required to spend a year as a mechanic after college before allowed into the automotive field as well.I think ChinaMart needs to put the money where their mouth is.
I firmly believe that Chinamart's executives need to get their ***** in a store every darn week for a few hours. Every single one of them, male or female.
The CEO, President, Board Members, and all those executive VP's need to spend a few hours a week at the doors greeting people and checking those receipts. They should take a few hours a week at rounding up the carts from the parking lot and bringing them in, cleaning the crappy restrooms, stocking the shelves, things like that. Lead by example, see what is really going on, having to see what the common workers have to go through working for ChinaMart in a ChinaMart store. Executives have no idea what is really going on in their stores, it's probably like being in the Ivory Tower. They should have to spend time every week seeing how not just the customers, but also the lowly employees, have to live with and work within the system they create.
I think he may be thinking like the TV series of Undercover boss or undercover millionaire. Those folks sit in an ivory tower, finally having to visit their stores as a worker and see what needs improved.Where do you get the idea that they do not know what life is li,e in any given store?
There is a grain of truth in that, for sure.I suspect that knowing that there is an effort to check receipts at the exit has some of the same effect of seeing a trooper parked in the median of I-40. It would be interesting if there was a comparison of shoplifting losses of stores with checking vs. those that do not. There must be some benefit or they probably would not spend the wages to have the employee there.
Excellent point that proves my stance. I ignore exit-door employees, and if a management-type wishes to come out to the parking lot to "discuss" the situation with me, I'll "talk" to him/her. Once. If he/she gets pissy and invites me to take my business (well over $18,000 per year) elsewhere, I'll gladly do so.I guess I'm just not that fragile or snowflakey.
To each their own.
I won't take out on an employee what should be taken up with an employer.
I am a 71 year old [Vietnam] Veteran, family man, retired business owner, tax payer, and responsible gun owner/citizen/voter that has also never had any trouble with the law and have learned to view the 'whole picture' and not just where ME fits in it . . . and that 'view' shows me that some (probably just above poverty) retired peasant is working at a place they would rather not work at, tasked with doing a menial job they would rather not do, in order to get a crappy paycheck and little to no benefits. The last thing they need in their difficult enough lives are a few 'entitlment believing' a-holes giving them a bunch of chit for doing the job they are required to do.Excellent point that proves my stance. I ignore exit-door employees, and if a management-type wishes to come out to the parking lot to "discuss" the situation with me, I'll "talk" to him/her. Once. If he/she gets pissy and invites me to take my business (well over $18,000 per year) elsewhere, I'll gladly do so.
Other than that, I will NOT be treated like an already-convicted criminal. Under any circumstances. Ever. Period. (As a 70-year-old combat veteran, family man, business owner, tax-payer, responsible gun owner/citizen/voter, who has never had any trouble with the law... I've damned-well earned my position in society, as well as the right to be trusted and treated with common courtesy/dignity- and if THAT is your definition of "snowflakey," then you're the one with the problem.)
Last time I looked, "not taking the 'attitude' out on these receipt checkers" (ie, ignoring them) and "letting management know that you are not happy with their policy" is precisely what I just described my position to be.I am a 71 year old [Vietnam] Veteran, family man, retired business owner, tax payer, and responsible gun owner/citizen/voter that has also never had any trouble with the law and have learned to view the 'whole picture' and not just where ME fits in it . . . and that 'view' shows me that some (probably just above poverty) retired peasant is working at a place they would rather not work at, tasked with doing a menial job they would rather not do, in order to get a crappy paycheck and little to no benefits. The last thing they need in their difficult enough lives are a few 'entitlment believing' a-holes giving them a bunch of chit for doing the job they are required to do.
Enter your email address to join: