This is the part they are unable to grasp.You cannot make enough laws to stop crazy or to fix stupid.
Why is it so hard for politicians to comprehend that criminals (and crazies) DO NOT OBEY THE LAWS?
Yes agreed. In addition to men in general at times.
We used to have a system where folks that were a danger to themselves or society were sent to institutions where they were given care, and 3 squares a day.That all sounds very logical, but it is not practical. For the most part, these individuals that commit mass shootings, or individual shootings, have very little indications in their past that would rise to the level of "locking them up". We cannot begin incarcerating people who may become violent in the future. However, in most cases, the individuals have exhibited the potential to commit violence. The current background checking system does a poor job of identifying those types of folks, especially the ones with mental issues of a minor, but potentially serious, problem. The guy here in OKC that did a shooting at a local Louie's restaurant a couple of years ago is a good example. He should not have had access to a firearm, but how do we stop that without "infringing" upon his rights? Not everyone should have access to firearms or sharp instruments.
Those not armed in your descriptions were denied the ability to be armed by the restrictions to those venues? Folks at Vegas were not allowed to be armed by the function they were attending. If the Asian women were allowed to be armed, the first one or two may have been killed in a surprise attack that couldn't have been prevented, but the rest would have been warned at the different locations most likely.Good idea to be armed to defend yourself, however as much as we preach here, the majority of folks will not be armed. Students in school will not be armed. Concert goers in Las Vegas will not be armed. The women in this instance were no armed, and most likely never would be. So the question remains, should everyone be allowed access to firearms?
A liberal-created failure that goes entirely ignored is the left’s harmful agenda for society’s most vulnerable people—the mentally ill.How exactly did 'the liberals' close those facilities?
Good idea to be armed to defend yourself
I was gonna say how do you know, but going to refrain from that question because I don't know.I agree ... but if you appendix carry, it could get in the way of being serviced at the massage parlor.
I was gonna say how do you know, but going to refrain from that question because I don't know.
Enter your email address to join: