Yes, consider the source on this one.mightyrodent is trolling
Yes, consider the source on this one.mightyrodent is trolling
Objectivism is about as much a philosophy as Scientology is. Third-rate hacks are a dime a dozen, and consumer capitalism makes gods of them.what about her philosophy makes her a third rate hack exactly? I expected her to be well received on this forum full of pro right wing, pro capitalism, pro individuals freedoms, pro SMALL government people...which is exactly what she promoted in her books.
I read her books several decades ago. I agree with much of her philosophy, but she comes off as pedantic, not to mention didactic, at least to me.
She will take 25 pages to make a point, grinding it ever more fine, until I just don't care anymore.
Then, two chapters later, she'll circle back around and take a few more whacks at that poor horse.
Which is why her novels are 900 pages. That's 900 pages of small type.
With no pictures.
The world would have benefited immensely if her editor had taken a chainsaw to her. Which would have been, of course, a very anti-Randian thing to do.She would have benefited greatly from an editor...an editor with a chainsaw.
Enter your email address to join: