I am always for the defense, in the sense that I think everyone should have the opportunity to point out every weakness in the accusations against him and every fact casting doubt upon them. I don't believe that there can be much assurance that someone is actually guilty of what he is accused of if he doesn't have the opportunity to defend himself in this way.
As far as the prosecution goes, if there is enough evidence that it appears that a person likely aggressed against another, I am "for" the prosecution in that I do believe that person should be prosecuted, to find out whether there are any reasonable doubts as to his guilt. I am never "for" the prosecution in the sense that I want them to win the case. If the finder of fact determines that there are reasonable doubts, I don't want the prosecution to win.
Of course I don't think anyone should ever be prosecuted for something that doesn't involve the initiation of force against another person, so I am completely against the prosecution in any situation where there is not an alleged victim. In any prosecution for a victimless crime, I always hope the defendant wins regardless of whether he is guilty, and support any actions taken to defend against or evade the prosecution, including physical resistance and escape.
As far as the prosecution goes, if there is enough evidence that it appears that a person likely aggressed against another, I am "for" the prosecution in that I do believe that person should be prosecuted, to find out whether there are any reasonable doubts as to his guilt. I am never "for" the prosecution in the sense that I want them to win the case. If the finder of fact determines that there are reasonable doubts, I don't want the prosecution to win.
Of course I don't think anyone should ever be prosecuted for something that doesn't involve the initiation of force against another person, so I am completely against the prosecution in any situation where there is not an alleged victim. In any prosecution for a victimless crime, I always hope the defendant wins regardless of whether he is guilty, and support any actions taken to defend against or evade the prosecution, including physical resistance and escape.