Before I got married and was just dating my wife she was on food stamps. She was a single mother of 2 who got nothing from her deadbeat ex. She worked a part time job and went to school half a day. If it wasnt for food stamps her girls wouldnt have had much in the way of food to eat. Do you really expect a 5 and an 8 year old girls to eat beans and corn bread everynight of the week?
OK.....about the whole "beans and cornbread thing; it started here:
Why do you care? If they spend their money on that and don't have any for the rest of the month, they are in the same boat we are. Why do we feel like if we extend charity or fund a food stamp program they need to eat beans and cornbread every day?................ Who knows, or who cares, it could be a party, and people on assistance have just as much right to splurge as someone that isn't.
And I made the comment:
You've got to be kidding me.....they have a "RIGHT" to "splurge" on assistance money fleeced from the paychecks of others? They don't have a "RIGHT" to sh*t.......they should be thankful to get beans and cornbread from the forced charity of others.
No one said that's all they should be given; my whole point is that if people are getting charity looted from the paychecks of others, they should be thankful if that's all they did get. Now, I have no problem with those who've paid into the system using it to help get them back on their feet - that's what it is for. But I detest the notion that people have a right to get on "assistance" and buy lobster with it. That ain't "assistance", that's abuse, as far as I'm concerned.