please note I've been posting C19 world class technical documents in CDC admits death toll is inflated! thread for quite sometime. all with actual evidence of course.
Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 57 studies, 21 peer reviewed, 37 with results comparing treatment and control groups. Submit updates/corrections below. FLCCC provides treatment recommendations
https://c19ivermectin.com/
Details Source PDF
https://ivmmeta.com/ivm-meta.pdf
Early, Late, PrEP, PEP
Covid Analysis (Preprint) (meta analysis)
Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 37 studies
• 100% of the 37 studies to date report positive effects. Early treatment is more successful, with an estimated reduction of 82% in the effect measured using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.18 [0.10-0.34]. Prophylactic use also shows high effectiveness.
• 100% of the 19 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated reduction of 72%, RR 0.28 [0.17-0.48].
• The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 37 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 137 billion (p = 0.0000000000073).
Early treatment 82% improvement RR 0.18 [0.10-0.34]
Late treatment 45% improvement RR 0.55 [0.42-0.72]
Prophylaxis 90% improvement RR 0.10 [0.05-0.23]
Total 37 studies 265 authors 10,509 patients
RCT 19 studies 152 authors 2,699 patients
Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 57 studies, 21 peer reviewed, 37 with results comparing treatment and control groups. Submit updates/corrections below. FLCCC provides treatment recommendations
https://c19ivermectin.com/
Details Source PDF
https://ivmmeta.com/ivm-meta.pdf
Early, Late, PrEP, PEP
Covid Analysis (Preprint) (meta analysis)
Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 37 studies
• 100% of the 37 studies to date report positive effects. Early treatment is more successful, with an estimated reduction of 82% in the effect measured using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.18 [0.10-0.34]. Prophylactic use also shows high effectiveness.
• 100% of the 19 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated reduction of 72%, RR 0.28 [0.17-0.48].
• The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 37 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 137 billion (p = 0.0000000000073).
Early treatment 82% improvement RR 0.18 [0.10-0.34]
Late treatment 45% improvement RR 0.55 [0.42-0.72]
Prophylaxis 90% improvement RR 0.10 [0.05-0.23]
Total 37 studies 265 authors 10,509 patients
RCT 19 studies 152 authors 2,699 patients
Last edited:
