- Status
^ And your little cat too!
(Read in the voice of The Wicked Witch of the West...)
(Read in the voice of The Wicked Witch of the West...)
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“.
Here are 2 compilation pdfs containing ~60 responses from 47 institutions in 10 countries re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2” last updated February 12, 2021:
Part 1: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-...47-institutions-Feb-12-2021-chrono-part-1.pdf
Part 2: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-...47-institutions-Feb-12-2021-chrono-part-2.pdf
As of February 13, 2021: 48 institutions and offices have responded thus far, and none have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation.
Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“.
Here are 2 compilation pdfs containing ~60 responses from 47 institutions in 10 countries re the isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2” last updated February 12, 2021:
Part 1: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-...47-institutions-Feb-12-2021-chrono-part-1.pdf
Part 2: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-...47-institutions-Feb-12-2021-chrono-part-2.pdf
As of February 13, 2021: 48 institutions and offices have responded thus far, and none have provided or cited any record describing “SARS-COV-2” isolation.
ONLY POISONED MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS ‘GREW’ THE ‘VIRUS’
https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
his week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
his week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
JAN 10, 2021
Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"
Dr. Mike Yeadon
In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.
In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:
Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"
Dr. Mike Yeadon
In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.
In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:
that's true once folks gets exposed to what they are actually getting injected with.
an experimental gene therapy that's NOT been approved by FDA. which has to pass phase 3 safety trials. so far NO mRNA gene therapy has passed long term animal tests. this is after decades of trying. excellent initial antibody response in animals, only to die say a year later when exposed to target virus.
scientist call this .. trojan horse symptom when exposed to target virus in wild. virus now has a gateway in.
further .. white blood cells which normally swoops in to kill invading bacteria and viruses. keeping it simple without bringing in subtypes. let's call it type 1 and 2. type 1 brings in all the desired reactions like cytoclines, etc. then type 2 comes in shuts down type 1 and cleans up.
potential problem with mRNA "vaccines" aka gene therapy create spike proteins, which shuts down type 2 white blood cells. meanwhile type 1 white blood cells doing it's job, now goes wild into a cytocline storm, killing test animals 20% to 50% in long term trials.
this is without getting into a host of other potential side effects including possible long term fertility issues. including damaging nutrients necessary for placenta to develop. this possibly goes for males too ... very scary!
then factor .. above risks vs C-19 with 99.5% survival for under age 70 folks without treatment.
latest treatment with ivermectin/zinc/doxycycline flat shuts down C-19. hands down I'd rather get C-19 instead of taking an experimental gene theraphy that NO one knows what long term side effects will be.
everything above is typed from memory and folks are accusing me of not understanding technologies involved.
- Status
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Oklahoma City Trades added Price drop Heavy duty extruded metal Cabinet- Latest: Almost Jack Burton
-
-
