That just confirms what I said - most people have an entirely nonfactual understanding of him.
That isn't entirely accurate about Hitler, either.
And again: what about WTC7?
That just confirms what I said - most people have an entirely nonfactual understanding of him.
Steve, im not busting your chops, however, i read your 911 link, even read the bibliography/citations.
Its loaded, not with facts but with misinformation. It appears like a good high school paper.
I wont be critical but heres an example; the mayor was warned about the attack a day befor. Okay fair enough, he got an un-named uncited warning. Then in same citation he was quoted as saying , at 8am he watched on tv as the world trade center was being attacked. He was in California!!!
He could not have watched the attack at 8am. We was attacked around 845 eastern time.
Maybe the author goofed. Anyway the link you provided is full of errors.
Of all the things that don't add up... number one for me is how countless scientists, including Underwriters Labs, so that under no circumstances could a jet fuel fire melt the steel columns... and again, many many engineers and architects who believe there is no explanation for the collapse other than controlled demolition.
Wow... Reviving a 9+ year old thread just to belittle someone's opinion and call them names. Yeah...that's the mark of a deep thinker for sure.
Enter your email address to join: