Skiluvr03;1507647I don't remember anything in the video stating rather the CC'er was charged said:The man was in his store, his castle. The woman could sue him for emotional damages I suppose.
That incident is completely different from being in a QT or similar as a customer. The way I see it the perp is pointing the gun at the clerk. The clerk does not carry a weapon and his duty is to comply and give him the money. The owner of the store wants the clerk to give the robber the money. I see it as a stretch to assume that the best course of action is to start shooting, considering that the vast majority of robberies ends with the loss of money.