Lets just hope that you don't have a CCW permit. Your comments show that you aren't mature enough to handle that responsiblity and privilege.
ask me how much your opinion matters to me
Lets just hope that you don't have a CCW permit. Your comments show that you aren't mature enough to handle that responsiblity and privilege.
A blood test from autopsy...We need to clarify:
A positive marijuana test really means little as to if he was under the influence at the time of the assault, or weeks before, or in some cases even months before.
I dont understand why people think Zimmerman needed some badge etc to ask another citizen whats he doing. Sure the other guy...in this case Martin can be a prick and fight or he can understand Zimmermans mind set...Hes on a neighborhood watch...HES SUPOSE TO ASK WHAT PEOPLE ARE DOING THAT ARE OUT OF PLACE. Thats the whole point of nieghborhood watches.
These are all known ...facts...after the incident . These things werent Known to any Prudent persons.Like was said gz was on his way back to his vech, after it was ..Suggested..he didnt need to follow the suspect, when he was attacked. NOW a prudent person would defend himself....when you throw away the race issues, forget trying to figure out if G.Z. is white or latin, apply the reasonable and prudent person test:
1. A reasonable and prudent person (neighborhood watch even) does not hassle someone that is not committing a crime, and who is rightfully there because he is visiting his father who lives in the neighborhood.
2. A reasonable and prudent person does not ignore a dispatchers request to not follow the person, especially if LEO has been dispatched.
3. A reasonable and prudent person does not get out of the safety of his vehicle to confront a person that is much larger than he, especially knowing he has been told not to do so and LEO is on the way.
If you apply these basic facts, who is in the wrong? That is what the jury should be pondering.
Enter your email address to join: