It's all in the interpretation...
The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.
South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905).
"It is literally true that the U.S. Supreme Court has entirely liberated itself from the text of the Constitution."
- US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 128 S. Ct.
2783, 2788 (2008) (quoting United States v. Sprague,
282 U.S. 716, 731 (1931)). “Constitutional rights are
enshrined with the scope they were understood to
have when the people adopted them, whether or not
future legislatures or (yes) even future judges think
that scope too broad.” Id. at 2821.
I agree. I advocate removing the ability to interpret that particular section.