Thanks, Dave. I guess I should have excluded the phrase "as written", and just stuck with "explained and discussed" on OSA (in the past).
Last edited:
And if the threat ceases to press his threat? If he surrenders, or otherwise makes it clear that he's going to be compliant?
I really hope you're never called upon to fire in anger, or that if you are, your posts don't get into the hands of the prosecutor and/or plaintiff's attorney.
I do. I guess it just boils down to having to make a judgement call because there really can't be a "script" for these things. It appears the ladies judgement in this case worked out.You see what I mean...?
EnglishIt's not firing in anger. It's employing deadly force to stop a threat to your life when someone else has first employed deadly force.
Actually, I'm kinda glad you sent me back to the statutes; I didn't realize it had changed just a couple of weeks ago (for the better, IMHO). Never a bad thing to review the state of the law.Thanks, Dave. I guess I should have excluded the phrase "as written", and just stuck with "explained and discussed" on OSA (in the past).
I do. I guess it just boils down to having to make a judgement call because there really can't be a "script" for these things. It appears the ladies judgement in this case worked out.
Enter your email address to join: