Army plans to ditch the M4/5.56 for new rifle and larger rounds

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Frederick

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
2,742
Reaction score
2,315
Location
Oklahoma City
https://www.armytimes.com/articles/...inside-the-armys-plan-to-ditch-the-m4-and-556

"After carrying the M16 or one of its cousins across the globe for more than half a century, soldiers could get a peek at a new prototype assault rifle that fires a larger round by 2020.

Army researchers are testing half a dozen ammunition variants in “intermediate calibers,” which falls between the current 7.62 mm and 5.56 mm rounds, to create a new light machine gun and inform the next-generation individual assault rifle/round combo.

The weapon designs being tested will be “unconventional,” officials said, and likely not one that is currently commercially available."

I've been reading over the last few years about a army research into several new weapons. The XM8 debacle comes to mind.

Of course, the U.S. Army recently replaced it's Beretta contracts with a Sig Sauer P320. It's just unfortunate that they're sticking with 9mm instead of switching to a larger round such as 40 SW or .45 ACP in my view.

https://www.armytimes.com/articles/glock-protests-armys-choice-of-sig-sauer-for-new-handgun

I have mixed feelings about this new search for a new standard issue rifle, but as long as it is better for the troops and is reasonably priced i don't see why not.

I just hope whatever it is, it's available to the public. Maybe they'll sell off their old stocks of 5.56/7.62 to the public. I doubt it given the liberal scum we have in Congress, but it would be nice to see ammo prices plummet.
 

NightShade

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
4,116
Reaction score
1,812
Location
Guthrie
From what I can tell about half of the BS is that they want to blow a ton of money on something new and unproven rather than converting a proven platform to a larger caliber.
 

Frederick

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
2,742
Reaction score
2,315
Location
Oklahoma City
From what I can tell about half of the BS is that they want to blow a ton of money on something new and unproven rather than converting a proven platform to a larger caliber.

No doubt an attempt to line pockets. That's why they ditched the M1911.

Honestly, i don't think it would be so bad to adopt a new weapon if it is proven more reliable and effective.
 

Frederick

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Messages
2,742
Reaction score
2,315
Location
Oklahoma City
Meh, might as well go with AK-47s. From what I've read, they're already familiar with those... :D

I don't think an AK variant would be too bad. A modified, modernized version in 5.56 would probably be pretty effective. though you'd be making tradeoffs, it would be cheaper in the long run.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom