Unable to "Vietnamize" the war, Moscow has intensified its effort to brutalize the Afghan population into submis-sion. The central theme of Soviet occupation is one of
sheer and inhuman brutality. Most of the atrocities visited on the population are the result of calculation. They are not the misfortunes of collateral damage. Whole sectors of
the country have become free fire zones. In areas where Soviet convoys have been attacked, ground and air forces have raided villages, destroyed crops, and bayonetted women
and children.19 Small antipersonnel mines disguised as ballpoint pens, books and watches have been air dropped indiscriminately with the intent of maiming the rebels and
their supporters.20 Most victims have been children and livestock. A Red Cross hospital in Pakistan now specializes in amputees.21
An incident occurred in 1981 in which twelve rebel sympathizers were executed by running over them with tanks.22
Irrigation wells are systematically polluted, refugee columns are strafed, and camps in Pakistan are subjected to air raids.
On September 13, 1982 one hundred and five civilian males who had fled to the shelter of a tunnel were incin-erated alive when Soviet troops pumped gasoline into the
tunnel and ignited it with rifle fire.23
Although the popular press in the United States has avoided or equivocated on this issue, there is no doubt about Soviet use of lethal chemical agents in Afghanistan.
The State Department reports 59 separate incidents in 15 provinces.24 Lethal agents include persistent and non persistent varieties including tricotlecene toxins which
kill in a particularly painful and spectacular fashion, with predictable psychological effects.25 This fact of the war will be addressed in more detail in a following chapter.
In short, Soviet policy includes a combination off scorched earth and migratory genocide. Cruelty and atro-cities characterize the Soviet effort in Afghanistan.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/1985/SKJ.htm
Scorched earth or subjugation? Any war that features such an enormous disparity of force, yet manages to last a decade wouldn't qualify in my book. I see the Afghan war as more of a "See, we can sustain a Vietnam type war too!". Even the otherwise brutal Russians didn't have the heart to win it.
Sadly, to win a war in the Afghan region would require extermination of an entire population. They wallow in greed, corruption, poverty and ignorance, yet they consider themselves superior and refuse to entertain outside influence. They're too dumb and stubborn to ever surrender unconditionally, so the best policy is to never go there in the first place. As you stated before, the justification for invading Afghanistan was to kill OBL and destroy al-queda. Well they haven't been there for a long time, so what the hell are we still doing there? Absolutley nothing we do there now or in the future will have any impact on how Afghanistan is run or the threat to the U.S. So it's past time to GTFO.
But I digress, Graham is an idiot and a RINO, so I enjoy watching anyone who takes him to task.