Breaking: ATF Changes Their Mind On Pistol Braces AGAIN

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Letfreedomring

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Feb 21, 2022
Messages
2,280
Reaction score
6,064
Location
74053
"U.S. constitutional and constitutional criminal law have a doctrine called vagueness. A statute is void for vagueness if it does not clearly communicate its purpose to a person of average intelligence. In other words, a criminal statute must be intelligible to the workaday layman before it can impose criminal liability. Notice is a cornerstone of statutory criminal law. Vague, equivocal statutes that can be understood any number of ways are ripe for abuse by overly zealous prosecutors and political enemies.

There are similar doctrines for other areas of the civil law, such as real property. If a deed fails to sufficiently identify a parcel of land, any conveyance under that deed is void. It is void for vagueness."
-Barnhardt
 

Seadog

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
5,705
Reaction score
7,065
Location
Boondocks
I have never seen one. Thought it home made. Thanks on the info!
Not sure if they make newer models but they have been around since the 60s. The originals say Enforcer on them to make sure that it is known that it was made as a pistol and not a chopped rifle.
 

OK Corgi Rancher

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2020
Messages
7,411
Reaction score
23,293
Location
Greater Francis, OK metropolitan area
I believe his sarcasm might have been lost on you, but maybe I misread him.

You didn't misread him. But it was confusing...especially the part at the end of his post where he said "extreme sarcasm".

Yeah...definitely confusing...


(Extreme sarcasm)
 

OK Corgi Rancher

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2020
Messages
7,411
Reaction score
23,293
Location
Greater Francis, OK metropolitan area
So the recent temporary injunction by the 5th Circuit Court states all members of the FPC, customers of Maxim Defense, the other plaintiffs, and all family/household members of these people, have relief from the AFT rule change. The brace ruling no longer applies to them pending further court action.
 

O4L

Sharpshooter
Staff Member
Special Hen Moderator Moderator
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
14,532
Reaction score
18,604
Location
Shawnee
So the recent temporary injunction by the 5th Circuit Court states all members of the FPC, customers of Maxim Defense, the other plaintiffs, and all family/household members of these people, have relief from the AFT rule change. The brace ruling no longer applies to them pending further court action.
A lot of people are joining FPC because of this. The ruling seems to leave it wide open as to the date of membership. $30 to join it looks like.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom