I think you're infering something he isn't implying.Are you implying that government should be provide homeowner's insurance for the personally irresponsible?
I think you're infering something he isn't implying.Are you implying that government should be provide homeowner's insurance for the personally irresponsible?
I think you're infering something he isn't implying.
WoW, is about all I have to say.F*** those firefighters and anyone that agrees with them.
Wow, this is sad and pathetic on the firefighters. I'm active duty and have been called some horrible things, spit on, and physically threatened because of my military service, but I still do it and will still fight for those people that degraded me. They won't save a man's house and property because he didn't pay the annual $75. I guess I never realized firefighting was a "for profit" organization. There was a time when people became firefighters(police, miiltary) to help others. They had the skills and equipment necessary to prevent him from being homeless and didn't out of spite. F*** those firefighters and anyone that agrees with them.
nothing all that concerning there about shooting some water on a trailer.
it's not fusion.
Are you implying that government should be provide homeowner's insurance for the personally irresponsible?
They had the skills and equipment necessary to prevent him from being homeless and didn't out of spite. F*** those firefighters and anyone that agrees with them.
Are you implying that government should be provide homeowner's insurance for the personally irresponsible?
firefighters don't get injured working on fires?
keep it real in this instance,there was no rescue just extinguishing a fire which is what these guys are trained to do.
I guess you consider scraped knuckles an injury?
uh,ok.
your post indicates that you didn't read the link i posted earlier.
keep it real
Enter your email address to join: