Is anybody following the manhunt down in the Davis/Wynnewood area?

[JoeUSooner]

Bob, you misunderstand... under the 1st Amendment, it is perfectly legal to make a general statement such as "He ought to be shot!" But it is not legal to make a statement such as "Let's shoot him," which is active incitement. There's a distinct difference.
Mulberry volunteered to act as a hangman, which - as long as his offer applies to a properly-convicted criminal - is not at all illegal. In fact, Mulberry's offer is similar to my longstanding position. While I flatly will not intentionally incite anyone to commit violence, if certain violent acts do actually occur... I will be among the first in line to donate to the accused's defense fund (which is a perfectly legal action).

By the way, Mulberry... you're correct. Bob has no functional, viable, workable, or practical solution to the problem of societal/mob or individual violence - nor does any liberal, for that matter. Asking Bob to provide a solution is a waste of your time.

 

[PanhandleGlocker]

A dump truck you say?

Hey, @Dumpstick ! You ok, man?!?

 

[Snattlerake]

If you are wrong and he is still in the area he is getting mighty hungry by now (if he is eating, (where is he getting his food?). Regardless, he will not be taken alive based on shooting an officer and facing a myriad of charges-probably the shooting of the guy in the dump truck. He isn't a good guy under any circumstance,
But you are probably correct that he is no longer in the area-but how did he travel out of the area with no car? Homie? Probably you're right on that also.

Fast food dumpsters have a lot of food they just throw out at the end of the day.

 

[El Pablo]

We are in the area in our RV. Everyone got alerts on their phone with a description that he had dreadlocks. It’s highly unlikely he would wander in here, but precautions have been taken.

We got them wed in okc at 12:45 pm

 

[El Pablo]

Biden will just pardon him because he said he doesn’t have white privilege and if so he would vote for him

he would only be able to pardon him for federal crimes, not state.

 

[Beautiful Mulberry]

he would only be able to pardon him for federal crimes, not state.

You’re correct however, at this point in his presidency as much illegal stuff that he has done, it wouldn’t put it past. Nathan tried because there is literally no one that would, or will stop him.

 

[Snattlerake]

Well, it starts with not associating with the crazies on here. You’re not the only sociopath on this forum, so you have your own club to hang out with.

BTW, it’s prob not prudent to advocate killing the current President on a public forum. Unbelievable.
Any other politicians you want to kill? As long as you volunteered to do the hanging, might as well make a list.

Ooooo! Oooooo! I have a list! I have a list!

 

[okcBob]

You avoided my question bob.
I understand you’re a therapist. I see you hold the same tools I do to cast judgement on someone.
You’re part of what’s wrong with this country.
Do I not have 1A? I guess not. Before long we are going to have speak easys in our home. Again! Our 2A has been slowly disappearing since 30s. NO ONE has not done anything to stop it. It’s gotten worse. No amount of voting or talking will work. If it has prove me wrong.
Do you let the traitor in chief know that he should not be creating tyrannical rules/laws? I bet not. Does that make you an accomplice for giving me the idea about the list?
So I ask again bob, what is your solution?
If you don’t answer I assume you think the same way I do it’s just you don’t have the to say it. I look forward to your solution! Educate me bob.

”I understand you’re a therapist”
Im not a therapist.

“You‘re part of what’s wrong with this country “
If part of what’s wrong with this country is calling out sociopaths who advocate killing the sitting POTUS, then call me guilty.

“Educate me Bob”
See a shrink

So I ask again, what other politicians do you want to hang?

 

[okcBob]

Bob, you misunderstand... under the 1st Amendment, it is perfectly legal to make a general statement such as "He ought to be shot!" But it is not legal to make a statement such as "Let's shoot him," which is active incitement. There's a distinct difference.
Mulberry volunteered to act as a hangman, which - as long as his offer applies to a properly-convicted criminal - is not at all illegal. In fact, Mulberry's offer is similar to my longstanding position. While I flatly will not intentionally incite anyone to commit violence, if certain violent acts do actually occur... I will be among the first in line to donate to the accused's defense fund (which is a perfectly legal action).

By the way, Mulberry... you're correct. Bob has no functional, viable, workable, or practical solution to the problem of societal/mob or individual violence - nor does any liberal, for that matter. Asking Bob to provide a solution is a waste of your time.

Tell us all again about how a Psychiatrist has to go through therapy in order to keep his license to practice. Still waiting for that one…

 

[Beautiful Mulberry]

”I understand you’re a therapist”
Im not a therapist.

“You‘re part of what’s wrong with this country “
If part of what’s wrong with this country is calling out sociopaths who advocate killing the sitting POTUS, then call me guilty.

“Educate me Bob”
See a shrink

So I ask again, what other politicians do you want to hang?

Bob I mean Father Time…smh. You’re not poking this bear anymore.