It looks like this is going to pass and I know the gist of the issue but is this not really a partisan thing?
It supposedly helps rural hospitals that can't stay in business but Stitt was against it and said the state can't afford it. The fed govt is supposed to pay for 95% of the cost.
I've found that Oklahomans tend to vote across party lines when it comes to more social issues within the state, while they tend to stick with party lines for national issues.
It supposedly helps rural hospitals that can't stay in business but Stitt was against it and said the state can't afford it. The fed govt is supposed to pay for 95% of the cost.
I've found that Oklahomans tend to vote across party lines when it comes to more social issues within the state, while they tend to stick with party lines for national issues.