Again, the 2nd is not about hunting or competitive shooting and your suggestion of restricting anything other than those infringes on our rights of freedom afforded in the Constitution.But some weapons that are not appropriate to hunting, self-protection, or competitive shooting should, perhaps, be restricted on the open market. I mean hey, besides EGO or bragging rights, why would someone need a howitzer or an armed jet fighter?
I'm not missing the point, I'm seeing that our main dog in the fight has decided to bend over to those who want nothing more than to chip away at our rights until they're not worth the paper they're written on. But things don't always go how we want and if, IF, this is how it is going to go, the NRA and our lawmakers would be doing us a great disservice by not gaining rights while they put even more useless restrictions on us.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Perhaps, but this ain't it!There comes a time when it may be necessary to forfeit a battle in order to win the war.
Just a thought.
In some states that recognize the right to bear arms, it's perfectly legal to carry in a bar.That statement is false , it says keep and bear shall not be infringed ......it doesn’t mention only bear arms on your property, it doesn’t say bear them anywhere but in public, if we take it literally ther should be no infringement on bearing your arms while bellies up to the he bar
There comes a time when it may be necessary to forfeit a battle in order to win the war.
Just a thought.
I hope you're right.Perhaps, but this ain't it!
If they were incarcerated for nonviolent crimes with a gun, I agree.If a person has paid their debt to society, their rights should be restored.
we are a republic, why do you think that society has to be a direct democracy?Define society? Are we going to make an app and everyone gets a vote? Approximately 1/2 half of society thanks there should be not guns at all ? Maybe in the perfect conservative Utopia society can decide .....but in reality society today would be split down the middle saying the reformed person should have never owned a gun in the first place....so how does this undefined society decide and what are the rules?
I am not disagreeing with your concept here only pointing out the fact that simply saying society decides really isn’t that simple.